I checked the door tags, which didn't mention a motor. Till it clicked in my head about the coil pack, I had no reason to question that it wasn't a 3.0...
I guess you do learn something new everyday! The PO was under the impression it was a 3.0... These v6's are all new to me. That would account for the mpg too. Looks like I'm movin' on up to the 4.0 forum!
In the antique bus scene, we use heat and paraffin wax. I thought it was a dumb idea the first time I heard it, now I have a little chunk of wax on stand by, at all times.
Up till this development, I would swear it was factory everything. It appears to be very unmolested, under the hood anyways. I suspect it was a fleet truck of some manner, earlier it's life. I can post a motor pic tomorrow, but it just looks like a factory 3.0 with edis.
It's got a coil pack. It's most definitely not the early motor(with a dizzy). I was just wondering if the 94 cut off date for the distributor equipped motor was correct.
According to what I read here, in the link below, the 3.0 had a distributor till 94. My 93 has no distributor. Is the info I'm reading correct? Thanks!
https://therangerstation.com/tech_library/3_0performance.html
The fact that others don't want too, or can't, is exactly why I will. I'm not the easy lego build type guy. It's just metal. I got a guy that can carve out a custom cam, I just need to figure out what kind of flow I can get.
Will the running boards from a 2004 supercab fit my 1993 supercab? Lengthwise, I'm certain they would fit, but are the frame rails the same? Thanks again guys!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.