Search results

*sigh* OK, can we please quit with the Regina jokes? They're not funny. Not only are they not funny, but they're a personal attack on me, because I'm originally from there. It's one thing to have fun at my expense because I did something dumb, or said something dumb. It's something entirely...

For sure. He's a bulldog, right?

Sorry. I'm just getting REALLY tired of his <censored> jokes about it.

Good to hear. That's a good lookin' mechanic.

I am FROM there, but I no longer live there, and haven't been back in seven years. Is that better?

What's the point of having two circuits if you're going to run them off the same reservoir? I thought the whole point was so that if you lost a brake line, you still had brakes...

You're welcome. Sorry to come across so cranky.

Should be on the cover (either the inside or the outside).

I can't say for sure, but I *think* my 1990 was set up diagonal. I had a leak in the left rear wheel cylinder. If it was set up front/back, I should have still had good braking power (but no back brakes). It felt like there was nothing there when the brake fluid got low. No, I shouldn't have...

I mean the opposite of clean. No, you're taking a slimy, sexually suggestive dig at a Canadian city. Being from that city, I don't particularly appreciate it.

I'm working on being kinder...

DO NOT DRIVE IT. Depending on how bad the leak is, three miles is long enough to lose all of your brake fluid. When that happens, NO BRAKES. WARNING: Even though brakes are set up with two "zones" (usually left front -> right rear and right front -> left rear), you can still end up with NO...

I'm shocked! That pun was revolting!

Too late. I think @Mrs. Eighty Five has an account here, so she probably already knows.

You took your Ranger out for a lunch date and left her in the parking lot?!

Y'know, we REALLY need to wash your dirty mind. Let me go get the fire hose.

Well, of course you're intelligent, on some level.

Are you implying, then, that YOU are an AI?

I wouldn't know. I haven't been there in seven years.

That would be a fairly accurate assessment.