• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Quick 351W question....


rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,387
Reaction score
7,477
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
My buddy is going to give me a smokin deal on a pretty hot (yet streetable) 351W if he dont sell it by spring....i have plans to replace the dead 351W in my 77 LTD II thats been in the garage since 07....

But...

His 351 is a 79, mines a 77. Can i use my flexplate (his 351 was bolted to a 4sp in a foxbody, mines a FMX auto), or will i run into balanceing issues?
 


bobbywalter

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Event Staff
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Technical Advisor
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ugly Truck of Month
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
23,470
Reaction score
4,668
Points
113
Location
woodhaven mi
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
FORD mostly
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
BIGGER
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
sawzall?
Tire Size
33-44
My credo
it is easier to fix and understand than "her"
windsor is windsor. 28


the little guy is the trouble maker. 81/2
 

adsm08

Senior Master Grease Monkey
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
Ford Technician
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
34,623
Reaction score
3,613
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31X10.50X15
Yeah, the 351 never changed. The 302 is the one that was all over the place.

FWIW Summit has all the 302 flex plates in all the arrangements, in both weights, so even that is less of an issue these days.
 

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,387
Reaction score
7,477
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
Ah ok. I knew the 302 was a PITA so i assumed the 351 was to. Thanks fellas
 

adsm08

Senior Master Grease Monkey
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
Ford Technician
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
34,623
Reaction score
3,613
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31X10.50X15
No, the 302 was rebalanced when Ford put a beefier crank in for better NVH. The 351 already had an overall heavier rotating assembly and didn't need that.
 

baddad457

Active Member
TRS Banner 2010-2011
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
2,604
Reaction score
18
Points
38
Location
Opelousas La.
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ranger
Transmission
Manual
No, the 302 was rebalanced when Ford put a beefier crank in for better NVH. The 351 already had an overall heavier rotating assembly and didn't need that.
Ford didn't beef up the 302 crank. They lightened it. And those first year's 50 oz cranks were notoriously weak. They improved the castings by the mid 80's though, but never added more weight. If you don't think this is true, put a 28 oz crank next to a 50 oz crank. Then weigh them both.
 

adsm08

Senior Master Grease Monkey
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
Ford Technician
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
34,623
Reaction score
3,613
Points
113
Location
Dillsburg PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
31X10.50X15
Ford didn't beef up the 302 crank. They lightened it. And those first year's 50 oz cranks were notoriously weak. They improved the castings by the mid 80's though, but never added more weight. If you don't think this is true, put a 28 oz crank next to a 50 oz crank. Then weigh them both.
Yeah, I probably had that backwards. I hate the 302. It is the most bastardized, red-headed step child engine Ford ever made. If you start trying to mix and match parts, not even internals, just whole engine and transmission assemblies from different eras, you are going to have a bad time.
 

bobbywalter

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Event Staff
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Technical Advisor
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ugly Truck of Month
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
23,470
Reaction score
4,668
Points
113
Location
woodhaven mi
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
FORD mostly
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
BIGGER
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
sawzall?
Tire Size
33-44
My credo
it is easier to fix and understand than "her"
i like it...for what it is.



but it takes 50 because of the wt redux like badad said.











the bolt architecture and clamping force to the block where the heads are concerned were the sore spot.


i think it was a brilliant engine...and the canadian x project was a 100 percent success.


its why i was bitching so much when they did the coyote and fugged up again:shok:.....they should have done a w setup so at least you could bore and stroke it. dikheds. 4 1/4 min bore spacing...and another 3/4 deck would be boobies and beer. so what if the pistons would be offset...
 

baddad457

Active Member
TRS Banner 2010-2011
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
2,604
Reaction score
18
Points
38
Location
Opelousas La.
Vehicle Year
1989
Make / Model
Ranger
Transmission
Manual
Yeah, I probably had that backwards. I hate the 302. It is the most bastardized, red-headed step child engine Ford ever made. If you start trying to mix and match parts, not even internals, just whole engine and transmission assemblies from different eras, you are going to have a bad time.
Yea, that's only true of the FEAD (Front End Accessory Drive) Otherwise it's one of the most compact engine designs ever made. Stroke it and it's even better. The only drawback over the years were the heads. It took them 40 years to get that right.
 

19Walt93

Well-Known Member
Ford Technician
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Nov 13, 2018
Messages
4,511
Reaction score
4,464
Points
113
Location
Canaan,NH
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
351
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Drop
3"
Tire Size
235/55R16
My credo
If you don't have time to do it right will you have time to do it over?
The 302 evolved during it's lifespan as I'd expect any product to do,as problems are identified they get fixed.Everything used to leak when cork was the gasket material of choice,now an oil drip is an unforgivable sin.The crank imbalance change adds some complication but all the later blocks are lighter and have one piece rear main seals.Lighter could mean weaker but I've seen 100,000 mile fox body Mustangs run 11 second quarter miles with just a supercharger bolted on.The head gaskets eventually give up but the bottom ends stay together.Less weight improves performance just like adding HP does,but without increased fuel consumption.Speaking of NVH,the 351 firing order was changed to fix a pre production vibration.The 82 Mustang GT used a 351 marine cam(because it already existed and was a little bigger) so it also used the 351 firing order.You can still mix parts,you just have to know what you're mixing to stay out of trouble.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top