• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

The 2019 Ford Ranger is yesterdays F-150


Jim Oaks

Just some guy with a website
Administrator
Founder / Site Owner
Supporting Vendor
Article Contributor
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Aug 2, 2000
Messages
13,416
Reaction score
8,535
Points
113
Location
Nocona, Texas
Vehicle Year
1996 / 2021
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0 / 2.3 Ecoboost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6-inches
Tire Size
33x12.50x15

We've all noticed that the horsepower and towing capabilities of pick-ups seems to increase all the time.

With the recent release of the 2019 Ford Ranger Specs;

https://www.therangerstation.com/forums/showthread.php?t=178562

I decided to see how they compare to a Ford F-150 produced around the time the Ford Ranger was first introduced.

2019 Ford Ranger Specs:

270 HP & 310 LB FT Torque
7,500 LB Towing Capacity
1,860 LBS Payload Capacity
Unknown MPG - Likely over 20 MPG

1986 Ford F-150 Specs:

185 HP & 270 LB FT Torque
7,500 LB Towing Capacity
1,500 Payload
12 MPG / 17 MPG

As you can see, the 2019 Ford Ranger actually has more horsepower and hauling capacity than the 1980's F-150 had. It's definitely going to get better MPG. Yet, people complain because the new Ranger ONLY has 270 horsepower.

So now that the Ranger has become the old F-150, what's next?

Well, there has been talk about a small pickup based off of the Ford Focus.

:dunno:
 


ratdude747

Member
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
503
Reaction score
22
Points
18
Age
31
Location
Madison, IN
Vehicle Year
1995
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Tire Size
215/70R15

Jim Oaks

Just some guy with a website
Administrator
Founder / Site Owner
Supporting Vendor
Article Contributor
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Aug 2, 2000
Messages
13,416
Reaction score
8,535
Points
113
Location
Nocona, Texas
Vehicle Year
1996 / 2021
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0 / 2.3 Ecoboost
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6-inches
Tire Size
33x12.50x15
These small 'Utes" as they're called do well in other countries.

However, Ford also has something going on with VW:

The Memorandum of Understanding signed by Ford and Volkswagen in June this year laid the foundations of a strategic partnership between two of the largest automakers in the world. Initially, the manufacturers are expected to just focus on co-developing an array of commercial vehicles, but will also work to “better serve the evolving needs of customers.” According to some industry specialists, this could mean that Ford and Volkswagen are pondering a full-fledged merger or an equity swap, which could form the largest single company in the industry.

An analysis by The Detroit Bureau points out that a partnership reaching far beyond the commercial vehicle market could be very beneficial for both sides. The German company could benefit from Ford’s strong positions on the American market, especially in the pickup and SUV segments, while the Blue Oval could use some help in Europe, Latin America, and China, where it’s currently weak.

Also, the two manufacturers could share successful platforms and help each other expand model lineups. For instance, Ford was once a pioneering brand in the EV technologies but is now lagging behind Volkswagen, which has an aggressive electrification plan. In return, Ford could help VW recover its image in the United States after the Dieselgate, for example, with a Ranger-based compact pickup.
 

Ranger850

Doesn't get Sarcasm . . .
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Jan 24, 2018
Messages
8,426
Reaction score
4,664
Points
113
Location
Tallahassee Florida
Vehicle Year
2001
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
Born with a 3.0, looking for a donor V8
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Lift
Stock 2"
Tire Size
Stock
My credo
Doing things wrong, until I get it right.
As said in another thread somewhere around here : Current "Ranger " could be actually be an F100: escape based truck = Ranger : focus based truck = Courier
I paraphrased the original but that would seem logical since there like GMC now only making trucks and SUVS
 

sgtsandman

Aircraft Fuel Tank Diver
TRS Forum Moderator
U.S. Military - Active
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Ham Radio Operator
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Messages
12,695
Reaction score
12,390
Points
113
Location
Aliquippa, PA
Vehicle Year
2011/2019
Make / Model
Ranger XLT/FX4
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC/2.3 Ecoboost
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Pre-2008 lift/Stock
Tire Size
31X10.5R15/265/65R17
I'm trying to remember some of the specifics from the late 1980's. I can't remember if light trucks had all the power choking devices on them yet like the cars did at that time.

Whether they did or not, people were used to vehicles being slower and more sluggish then compared to now. We are kinda spoiled with the power and amenities today's vehicles have now.

Vehicle manufactures have gotten better at generating horsepower out of a given engine size compared to then.
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,213
Reaction score
17,528
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
I'm trying to remember some of the specifics from the late 1980's. I can't remember if light trucks had all the power choking devices on them yet like the cars did at that time.

Whether they did or not, people were used to vehicles being slower and more sluggish then compared to now. We are kinda spoiled with the power and amenities today's vehicles have now.

Vehicle manufactures have gotten better at generating horsepower out of a given engine size compared to then.
My ‘85 had best in class horsepower at 110 raging Shetland ponies. And 55 is called out on the speedometer because that was the national speed limit at the time.

But F-150’s did not have more power than the new Ranger until 2004 and were a MUCH larger and heavier truck. With how ford gets power where ever they want it with an Ecoboost it should pummel the high winding competition.
 

pjtoledo

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
5,341
Reaction score
2,913
Points
113
Location
Toledo Ohio
Vehicle Year
20002005199
Make / Model
Fords
Engine Size
3.0 2.3
OK, it's obvious that about 5 people won't like the new Ranger. maybe Ford is targeting the other 69,995 potential buyers??
 

bobbywalter

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Event Staff
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Technical Advisor
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ugly Truck of Month
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
23,470
Reaction score
4,667
Points
113
Location
woodhaven mi
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
FORD mostly
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
BIGGER
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
sawzall?
Tire Size
33-44
My credo
it is easier to fix and understand than "her"
not sure if i am just going to buy one....or lease one first till the bugs are worked out.




getting one though.
 

Shran

Junk Collector
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
Solid Axle Swap
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
8,637
Reaction score
4,704
Points
113
Location
Rapid City SD
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
I'd add that the new Ranger is at LEAST 1000lbs heavier than the average '86 F150 and probably as much as a ton more than certain models. So there is the power to weight ratio thing although the torque curve is going to be drastically different between the engines offered in both trucks. 270hp will be plenty, and you know there will be tuners and stuff coming out to bump that up a bit.

That said, 185hp in my F150 is pretty snappy. Truly, a power to weight ratio issue.

My main complaint about the older half tons, especially in the 80's, is that their payload capacity just sucks. Half a ton of gravel will have mine sitting on the bump stops. Half a ton of gravel in my Ranger will also be on the bump stops but it'll carry the weight. I'm just usually disappointed with the older half tons in general, paired with all the smog crap, they were just turds in general.
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,213
Reaction score
17,528
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
I'd add that the new Ranger is at LEAST 1000lbs heavier than the average '86 F150 and probably as much as a ton more than certain models. So there is the power to weight ratio thing although the torque curve is going to be drastically different between the engines offered in both trucks. 270hp will be plenty, and you know there will be tuners and stuff coming out to bump that up a bit.
I am betting a heavy bullnose '150 would weigh about the same as a new Ranger.

Heck my std cab longbox Ranger with basically an '86 F-150 powertrain (aside from D28 and BW1350) weighs 4k. No way a F-150 would weigh less than that and I don't see the new Ranger weighing a ton more. My scab F-150 with a cast iron block V8 and 9.75 rear axle is just over 5k.

EDIT:

According to Wikipedia curb weight on the T6 varies between 4100-4300lbs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Ranger_(T6)
 
Last edited:

Shran

Junk Collector
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
Solid Axle Swap
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
8,637
Reaction score
4,704
Points
113
Location
Rapid City SD
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
I dunno man, my old '85 F250 weighed in at 6300... and it was a 4x4, extended cab long box with a 460. My '07 F250 is around 7800. It's been a while since my '86 half ton has been on a scale so I don't have an exact number but I'm guessing it's somewhere around 4500. Best information I can find about the new Ranger puts them just a hair over 6000.
 

85_Ranger4x4

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Article Contributor
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
32,213
Reaction score
17,528
Points
113
Location
SW Iowa
Vehicle Year
1985
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Manual
My 2002 F-150 which is physically larger is 5500 with a full tank of gas and me in it.

Adjusting for more saftey crap but with less than half the engine and smaller powertrain I don't think it would outweigh mine. Both have aluminum hoods but mine has a steel tailgate.

Overseas has diesels which will add weight too.
 

bobbywalter

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Event Staff
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Technical Advisor
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ugly Truck of Month
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
23,470
Reaction score
4,667
Points
113
Location
woodhaven mi
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
FORD mostly
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
BIGGER
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
sawzall?
Tire Size
33-44
My credo
it is easier to fix and understand than "her"
f 150 goes 4100-5800 pounds. yaaaay for pop cans...


i have seen written where 2wd 150's in the 80's were to weigh 3500-3800...just never seen it on a scale. i know my ext cab truck when it was actually a ranger weighed 4200 and some change and was a few pounds heavier then a bullnose 2wd 302 with manual on the same scale. the ranger is supposed to weigh 3900 ext cab 4x4 auto..

last winter at the auto show


they told us it was to be quite a bit south of 5 k...i figured 5300-5500 and told them my ranger was right at 6k with road tools full size spare and jack......the one at the show was not even close to our yankee version.


it was to be slightly heavier then the row t6 iirc...like a few hundred max...and that was compared to row gas engines. our explorer is right at 5k...they said it was much lighter then that.

so i figured based on the 2.3 explorers i have driven it will be acceptable for sure.


spec will be out soon enough.

by the time i am done i can see it being 6300.
 

ZMan

Forum Staff Member
TRS Forum Moderator
MTOTM Winner
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
3,778
Reaction score
406
Points
83
Age
38
Location
Medina, Ohio
Vehicle Year
1992,1994
Make / Model
Ford Rangers
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Total Drop
4/4, bagged
I dunno man, my old '85 F250 weighed in at 6300... and it was a 4x4, extended cab long box with a 460. My '07 F250 is around 7800. It's been a while since my '86 half ton has been on a scale so I don't have an exact number but I'm guessing it's somewhere around 4500. Best information I can find about the new Ranger puts them just a hair over 6000.
You're probably looking at GVWR, which is NOT the actual weight. The '15+ aluminum body F-150 is under 5k, and my '13 is under 6k. No way a new Ranger is going to weigh more than my steel body F-150.
 

don4331

Well-Known Member
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
2,007
Reaction score
1,329
Points
113
Location
Calgary, AB
Vehicle Year
1999
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.3
Transmission
Automatic
1986 Ford F-150 Specs:

185 HP & 270 LB FT Torque
7,500 LB Towing Capacity
1,500 Payload
12 MPG / 17 MPG
I'm surprised how much lower the US rating were than for my old man's '82 F-150:

1982 Cdn F-150 Specs:

210 HP & 330 LB FT Torque (351W)
2,530 lb Payload (Payload package #2)

Top of line Aussie Ranger SCrew 4x4 has curb of 2.1 tonne (4,600lbs) and GVWR of 3.2 tonne (7,000lbs). Knock off some for 2.3EB versus 3.2 PowerStroke, add some for American safety and numbers should be close.

I find it slightly strange that Volkswagen would sell Rangers when they have the Amarok (I know chicken tax; but how much assembly needs to be completed in US to avoid tax - one could ship pieces in from Europe/South America).

Saveiro G5, VW's Ute would have the same issue as they are currently manufactured in Brazil. Saveiro's I have seen in Mexico are inexpensive (dare I say cheap) - definitely a no frills ute. Other than unibody, a lot of what some of the forum's members say they are looking for.

What I think is VW is missing options in the CUV/SUV market with only Tiguan and Atlas that Ford could round out, while VW can supply sedans, should Americas love with SUV suddenly end.

Note: Ford Focus and Escape share the same starting platform, while Fiesta and EcoSport share the smaller one.

I don't think I would want a "Courier" off the EcoSport platform; "Escape" is small enough.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Members online

No members online now.

Today's birthdays

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Truck of The Month


Kirby N.
March Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top