Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and 
Wicked_Sludge
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2007
- Messages
- 6,937
- Reaction score
- 43
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 38
- Location
- Westport, WA
- Vehicle Year
- 1993
- Make / Model
- Ford
- Engine Size
- 3-point-GO
- Transmission
- Manual
depends on the setup. the stock 2.3 turbo isnt very big and winds up fast. it makes plenty of bottom end (in fact, there was a turbo coupe in the shop on wednesday for an alt., so the drive is still fresh in memory).
66 more ft-lbs at only 500RPM higher for stock 2.3's.
did some scouring on google, i managed to find this dyno slip from a turbo'd 2.3 duratec (couldnt find a non-duratec 2.3 dyno) @ 8PSI:
this is a different motor, so "your results may vary"...but it will act similer under boost. i can see the problem here dave.....who wants 150ft-lbs at 2,000 RPM. hes MUCH better off with the stock 134 ft-lbs and lower torque curve.
66 more ft-lbs at only 500RPM higher for stock 2.3's.
did some scouring on google, i managed to find this dyno slip from a turbo'd 2.3 duratec (couldnt find a non-duratec 2.3 dyno) @ 8PSI:
this is a different motor, so "your results may vary"...but it will act similer under boost. i can see the problem here dave.....who wants 150ft-lbs at 2,000 RPM. hes MUCH better off with the stock 134 ft-lbs and lower torque curve.
