• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

2005 4.0L into a 1990 Ranger


dangerranger406

New Member
Ford Technician
ASE Certified Tech
Joined
Dec 6, 2023
Messages
10
Reaction score
5
Points
3
Location
MT
Vehicle Year
1990
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Transmission
Manual
I got 2 4.0L motors for my 1990 ranger that currently has a 2.9L that is done, burning oil like a siv and knocks like a type writer, one engine came out of a 2005 Mustang, the other came out of a 2005 explorer,
i have the wiring harness for the 2005 motor, my question is whats the bare bones needed to get the swap done?
i have a drive by cable throttle body to delete the drive by wire, can i use the ECU from an older 4.0 to bypass the anti theft?
 


Josh P

Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2013
Messages
72
Reaction score
49
Points
18
Location
Phoenix, AZ
Vehicle Year
1991
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Manual
I'd use the 90-91 4.0 ohv ecm and wire it like an ohv engine.
 

SenorNoob

Well-Known Member
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
2,420
Reaction score
574
Points
113
Location
Middle Tennessee
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
1.5" Front + 4" Rear
Tire Size
245-70-R16
This. ^ It'll be by far the easiest way to handle the electrical. I know the SOHC will run on the older computer. And it and the wiring with it fits right into 90 truck.

I suppose you could adapt an early SOHC computer and matching harness to the 90 body. It wouldn't be easy tho. There was never an OBD1/EEC-IV SOHC computer. Nor any OBD2/EEC-V in the 90 body style. The layout was changed completely in 93. If you choose to go this route, I suspect a 98 Explorer would be the simplest. Pretty sure they could be had without PATS and with the SOHC.
 

dangerranger406

New Member
Ford Technician
ASE Certified Tech
Joined
Dec 6, 2023
Messages
10
Reaction score
5
Points
3
Location
MT
Vehicle Year
1990
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Transmission
Manual
Yeah that might be a possibility, we had a 05 mustang come into the dealership I work at to program keys, the PATS module is toast in it and everything is obsolete, I have an HP Tuner and can reprogram the ECU, but by the time I get harness and the license for that era Ford ECU I'm way out of my budget,

I'd like to get OBD2 support in the ranger, makes diag on issues and getting realtime feedback from systems so much easier, but yes it's ALOT of work, for now a project for further down the road as I unfortunately at this point in time don't have the time or place for something that extensive,

I guess my biggest concern was compatibility with sensors, I think the 90 harness could theoretically be wired into the sensor pigtails, if I could get a ECU for a 4.0L, since the 2.9L ECU lacks the fueling and are tables for the bigger displacement, also I think a few sensors have 3 and 4 wire where the 90 has single or double wire, and not sure the sensors themselves would cross over and the ignition system, going from a distributor on the 90s to a coil pack on the 05, a complete donor truck/explorer would be the ideal route, but tracking one down in my area has been a real challenge
 

SenorNoob

Well-Known Member
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
2,420
Reaction score
574
Points
113
Location
Middle Tennessee
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
1.5" Front + 4" Rear
Tire Size
245-70-R16
4.0 never had a distributor. It was always coil pack.

I know some of the early sensors can be bolted on the later engine. What would worry me the most is the crankshaft position sensor. Connector looks the same. Pretty sure they are both 36-1 wheels too.
 

dangerranger406

New Member
Ford Technician
ASE Certified Tech
Joined
Dec 6, 2023
Messages
10
Reaction score
5
Points
3
Location
MT
Vehicle Year
1990
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Transmission
Manual
Yeah, my 2.9 doesn't have a crank position sensor (that I am aware of or been able to find) so that'd have to be custom wired in
 

SenorNoob

Well-Known Member
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
2,420
Reaction score
574
Points
113
Location
Middle Tennessee
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
1.5" Front + 4" Rear
Tire Size
245-70-R16
It wouldn't. It used a pickup in the distributor for that.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2023
Messages
16
Reaction score
9
Points
3
Location
Alberta, Canada
Vehicle Year
1991
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
235/75R15
This. ^ It'll be by far the easiest way to handle the electrical. I know the SOHC will run on the older computer. And it and the wiring with it fits right into 90 truck.

I suppose you could adapt an early SOHC computer and matching harness to the 90 body. It wouldn't be easy tho. There was never an OBD1/EEC-IV SOHC computer. Nor any OBD2/EEC-V in the 90 body style. The layout was changed completely in 93. If you choose to go this route, I suspect a 98 Explorer would be the simplest. Pretty sure they could be had without PATS and with the SOHC.
hey, planning this into my 91 4.0 ohv, but i have many plans for the sohc before it goes in. would i be able to tune the 91 ecu more (obviously have to reprogram if i can just use it) beyond just making the sohc run off of the ohv computer. dont have any donor vehicle yet so are there any i should look out for? you said a 98 explorer but is it possible to use a later one with the timing chain upgrade?
 

SenorNoob

Well-Known Member
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
2,420
Reaction score
574
Points
113
Location
Middle Tennessee
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
1.5" Front + 4" Rear
Tire Size
245-70-R16
I can't see why any 4.0 SOHC wouldn't work. Just getting the wiring/computer from as early a model as possible would make it a little easier.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2023
Messages
16
Reaction score
9
Points
3
Location
Alberta, Canada
Vehicle Year
1991
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
235/75R15
any idea of how much harder the newer ones would be? been reading around a bunch of forums and obviously some sensor swaps as well as some newer ones, but nothing much seems to be too different between years, aside from the tensioners of course. would you recommend any specific ones? i know the mustangs have a different cam for more high end torque compared to the ranger/ explorer, unfortunately sacrificing the lower end power a truck benefits from. I don't know of any other variation other than the rarer 98-01 explorers with the variable intake whatever it was.
 

SenorNoob

Well-Known Member
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
2,420
Reaction score
574
Points
113
Location
Middle Tennessee
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
1.5" Front + 4" Rear
Tire Size
245-70-R16
Not really. I haven't messed with much newer than my own swap. It is a 94 engine with 91 Explorer harness and 92 PCM.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Members online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Latest posts

Truck of The Month


Shran
April Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top