• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

93 Ranger, is this a good deal?


William Spitzer

New Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2011
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Fulks Run, VA
Vehicle Year
1986,
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9, 2.3
Transmission
Manual
I found this through a friend on Facebook, and im not sure if its a good deal, or ive been out of a ranger for too long. it's 93, with a 3.0 and 5 speed, auto transfer case, 6 inch suspension, 3 inch body lift, with 35 inch tires. I feel like thats way too much tire for any stock ranger gearing, but thats just opinion. the front brakes need to be completely rebuilt, no big deal,it needs a bed, again, no big deal, i'll tube it or make a flatbed. The only thing im worried about is he said the rear frame is bent in slightly where the previous owner tried to pull it/something by the rear cross member. now it seams fairly evident to me that this truck was rode hard and put away wet, but i think it would make a good toy/ winter 4x4. He said make offer, and the best offer hes gotten has been $500. I'm going to check out how bad the frame is bent Thursday, so that will pretty much make or break the deal for me. Can anyone offer any insight?

 


Insanejughead

New Member
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
RBV's on Boost
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Jan 7, 2008
Messages
2,795
Reaction score
33
Points
0
Location
Missouri
Vehicle Year
'94, '86
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3T
Transmission
Manual
Are you sure that it still has the stock gearing in the differential?

I agree with the bed and brakes being no big deal, but neither is the gearing if you're thinking about doing anything hard with it.


If the tires are too big, you could think about getting smaller ones (31s or so) and take the body lift out. I'm not much into the 4x4s, but I agree with those tires being too big for stock differentials.
 

William Spitzer

New Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2011
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Fulks Run, VA
Vehicle Year
1986,
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9, 2.3
Transmission
Manual
I knowing the guy that's selling it, its got the stock gears, haha. can't really tell from the picture, but the tires don't look like there's to much life left in them anyway. I've actually got a spare set of 31 inch general grabbers from my last ranger that I'd probably put on anyway. I'm just worried about the frame, would it affect driving or tire wear since its in the back? I've never had any experience with bent frames or anything like that.
 

Insanejughead

New Member
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
RBV's on Boost
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Jan 7, 2008
Messages
2,795
Reaction score
33
Points
0
Location
Missouri
Vehicle Year
'94, '86
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3T
Transmission
Manual
For the back end of the ranger, no it won't affect anything.


If you're worried, you can check the parallel-ness of the frame rails with a tape measure. The most that a bent frame rail in the back will do is just affect how your leaf springs flex; even then, they'll need to be bent several inches to even make a difference.
 

brinker88

11/2013 OTOM Winner
Supporting Member
OTOTM Winner
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
3,498
Reaction score
36
Points
0
Location
Williamsport, Pa
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Automatic
That's a 4" suspension/ 3" body lift btw. For the price, you cant beat it tho. I say go for it, altho I wouldnt touch it with that 3.0L
 

William Spitzer

New Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2011
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Fulks Run, VA
Vehicle Year
1986,
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9, 2.3
Transmission
Manual
When I go see it how would I check how much of a suspension lift it has? Not doubting just curious. And I'll take a tape and measure it, shouldn't hard since the beds already off. And that's reassuring, the way he talks about it it didn't sound that bad, but I don't want to get excited about it yet. And as for the motor, he said he's not sure, but thinks its a 3.0. I'd definitely rather have the 4.0, but I loved my 98 with the 3.0, 250,000 miles and it was still kicking.
 

brinker88

11/2013 OTOM Winner
Supporting Member
OTOTM Winner
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
3,498
Reaction score
36
Points
0
Location
Williamsport, Pa
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Automatic
I can just tell by looking at the truck w/ 35s on it that it has the 4" suspension/3" BL by looking at the space in the wheel wells.

For example, I bought my truck for $400 in worse shape than that with a 3" BL installed, cracked heads, bad t-case motor, no driveshaft up front, etc etc...
 

William Spitzer

New Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2011
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Fulks Run, VA
Vehicle Year
1986,
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9, 2.3
Transmission
Manual
so I just got a text informing me it isn't the 3.0, its a 2.9. slowly looking less appealing.
 

brinker88

11/2013 OTOM Winner
Supporting Member
OTOTM Winner
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
3,498
Reaction score
36
Points
0
Location
Williamsport, Pa
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Automatic
2.9L? Um, that had to have been a custom engine swap as that motor became extinct with the arrival of the 3rd gen ranger...Unless they did a body swap on a 2nd gen.
 

det107

Active Member
TRS 20th Anniversary
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
23
Points
38
Location
Vails Gate, NY
Vehicle Year
2002
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
3.0
Transmission
Manual
so I just got a text informing me it isn't the 3.0, its a 2.9. slowly looking less appealing.
When you go out to check rear frame w/ tape measure, peek at the engine bay-
 

William Spitzer

New Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2011
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Fulks Run, VA
Vehicle Year
1986,
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9, 2.3
Transmission
Manual
So theres no way a 2.9 is factory?
 

Insanejughead

New Member
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
RBV's on Boost
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Jan 7, 2008
Messages
2,795
Reaction score
33
Points
0
Location
Missouri
Vehicle Year
'94, '86
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.3T
Transmission
Manual
Not if that body VIN matches the frame VIN.
 

William Spitzer

New Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2011
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Fulks Run, VA
Vehicle Year
1986,
1994
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9, 2.3
Transmission
Manual
Hmmmm, I really can't wait to get a look at this thing. how similar are the 4.0 and 2.9, could they be mistaken for one another?
 

brinker88

11/2013 OTOM Winner
Supporting Member
OTOTM Winner
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
3,498
Reaction score
36
Points
0
Location
Williamsport, Pa
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Transmission
Automatic
Not really, as one has a distributor and the other one doesnt.
 

PlumCrazy

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
V8 Engine Swap
OTOTM Winner
Solid Axle Swap
RBV's on Boost
2014 Truck of The Year
TRS Banner 2010-2011
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
4,545
Reaction score
179
Points
63
Location
Millersport, OH
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
Solid Axle Swap 4x4
The 2.9 says "2.9" in huge letters cast into the upper intake.lol

Sent from my C771 using Tapatalk 2
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Staff online

Members online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Mudtruggy
May Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top