• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Curious??


CAD

New Member
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
66
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Greeley, CO
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9L
Transmission
Manual
recently replaced my spark plugs and came across something unusual, bought a set of plugs for my 88 2.9L they gave me (Autolite 105's). But, the plugs that came out of the engine were (autolite 765's). The difference is that the 105's have approx. 1" of threads and the 765's have only a 1/2" of threads. I took the 105's back and replaced them with the 765's, since thats what was in there originally. My question is, why the big difference in thread length. Do I have different heads from stock (the parts house said that the 105's were the only plug they listed for my truck or is something like a poor man's anti fouling adapter? The plugs that came out showed no signs of fouling and except for normal wear were in pretty good condition.:icon_confused:
 


ab_slack

Member
TRS Banner 2012-2015
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
755
Reaction score
12
Points
18
Location
New Joisey
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
2.9L
Transmission
Manual
I recall encountering something like this and was wondering myself. I don't think it was on my BII with the 2.9L but may be recalling incorrectly.

When I saw it I thought, gosh one must stick in further than the other, but upon closer look the seat was the same distance from the end of the thread. One plug had threads the full length (3/4" to an inch) from the end to the seat while the other had threads for like 3/8" to 1/2" with the gap between threads and the seat narrowed so even if the full length in the head was threaded it would still go.

I don't know if the head has threads the full length or not. It may be that it didn't have threads and thus they were just saving money using less material and cutting less threads. Which may be okay I guess since it is same amount of thread engagement.

Or maybe the head was threaded all the way and they were cost reducing for the same reason at the expense of having less thread and thus putting all the stress on just the one portion of the thread.

Or maybe it some idea for keeping them from seizing as easily by having less thread engaged.

I don't know. In my case it was just one single plug I was using for test purposes.
 

SenorNoob

Well-Known Member
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Oct 24, 2012
Messages
2,488
Reaction score
632
Points
113
Location
Middle Tennessee
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
1.5" Front + 4" Rear
Tire Size
245-70-R16
Doesn't the length of the metal have something to do with the heat range? Or is that entirely inside the cylinder that matters?

Edit: This is direct from Autolite's site for a Ford Ranger 2.9

IRIDIUM XP XP105 Copper Core, Double Platinum, Fine Wire Center Electrode, Iridium Enhanced, Nickel Plated Shell, Trimmed Side Wire; .044 Gap
DOUBLE PLATINUM APP105 Copper Core, Double Platinum, Nickel Plated Shell; .044 Gap; Replaces APP765
PLATINUM AP105 Copper Core, Platinum; .044 Gap; Replaces AP765
RESISTOR 765 Copper Core; .044 Gap; OE or equivalent plug;
 
Last edited:

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Members online

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Mudtruggy
May Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top