• Welcome Visitor! Please take a few seconds and Register for our forum. Even if you don't want to post, you can still 'Like' and react to posts.

Does a higher output alternator give better fuel economy?


Angry Possum

No Fat Chicks, Truck Will Scrape
Supporting Member
Law Enforcement
Joined
Sep 18, 2021
Messages
594
Reaction score
473
Points
63
Location
Staten Island NY
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ranger XLT SC
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0 OHV
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
N/A
Total Drop
N/A
Tire Size
235 75 15
My credo
Sometimes you eat the bear, sometimes the bear eats you.
Oddly today, a good friend of mine is getting better gas mileage on his 2012 Ford Fusion 3.5 Liter engine since he replaced only the Alternator with a high output Alternator. His alternator was originally week for a month or so and he was getting real bad fuel economy, till he changed it today because his battery died.... Is this possible, and this is all he changed?

He found this out from his onboard fuel computer in the car, as he went from 10 mpg originally on the older alternator, to 19 mpg now with the new higher output alternator. I shit you not. This is very weird indeed.

If so I'm thinking of getting a higher output Alternator for my 93 Ranger 4.0l. It's due for one soon.
 
Last edited:


fastpakr

Forum Staff Member
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
U.S. Military - Veteran
V8 Engine Swap
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
8,022
Reaction score
2,838
Points
113
Location
Roanoke, VA
Vehicle Year
1999
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
5.0
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Tire Size
285/75-16
19 sounds totally normal, so the question is why he was getting 10 before.
 

Angry Possum

No Fat Chicks, Truck Will Scrape
Supporting Member
Law Enforcement
Joined
Sep 18, 2021
Messages
594
Reaction score
473
Points
63
Location
Staten Island NY
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ranger XLT SC
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0 OHV
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
N/A
Total Drop
N/A
Tire Size
235 75 15
My credo
Sometimes you eat the bear, sometimes the bear eats you.
19 sounds totally normal, so the question is why he was getting 10 before.
He doesnt understand either, he didn't change anything but the high output alternator. Before this, he was going to change his fuel pump and injectors. But didn't. It's a good thing his alternator crapped out. Or he would of done both the injectors and the fuel pump.
 

rusty ol ranger

2.9 Mafia-Don
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
12,474
Reaction score
7,584
Points
113
Location
Michigan
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Type
2.9 V6
Engine Size
177 CID
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
A legend to the old man, a hero to the child...
He don't understand, he didn't change anything but the high output alternator.
10mpg from a fusion?

Thats what my 460 F250 gets.

I wouldnt bet it was the alternator that made the difference. Maybe his old one was so weak it was throwing the ECM off?

Either way a good regular output would of fixed that too.
 

ericbphoto

Overlander in development
TRS Event Staff
TRS Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
TRS 20th Anniversary
VAGABOND
TRS Event Participant
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Feb 7, 2016
Messages
15,355
Reaction score
16,643
Points
113
Age
59
Location
Wellford, SC
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ford Ranger
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Engine Size
3.0L
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
6"
Tire Size
35"
My credo
In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they are different.
Switching from a HEALTHY normal sized alternator to a high output alternator would not do that.
However, if his original alternator was not working properly and voltage was fluctuating and often lower than it should be, then any number of vehicle systems would have been functioning improperly and possibly causing the low mileage. The 10mpg was bad and likely caused by electrical issues. The19mpg is in the realm of normal.
 

Angry Possum

No Fat Chicks, Truck Will Scrape
Supporting Member
Law Enforcement
Joined
Sep 18, 2021
Messages
594
Reaction score
473
Points
63
Location
Staten Island NY
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ranger XLT SC
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0 OHV
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
N/A
Total Drop
N/A
Tire Size
235 75 15
My credo
Sometimes you eat the bear, sometimes the bear eats you.
Switching from a HEALTHY normal sized alternator to a high output alternator would not do that.
However, if his original alternator was not working properly and voltage was fluctuating and often lower than it should be, then any number of vehicle systems would have been functioning improperly and possibly causing the low mileage. The 10mpg was bad and likely caused by electrical issues. The19mpg is in the realm of normal.
Yes most likely, I just didn't know putting in a healthy alternator would bring his mpg back to normalcy. I found that odd and yet interesting. The previous posts makes sense with especially with reference to the ECM I suppose.
 
Last edited:

Angry Possum

No Fat Chicks, Truck Will Scrape
Supporting Member
Law Enforcement
Joined
Sep 18, 2021
Messages
594
Reaction score
473
Points
63
Location
Staten Island NY
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ranger XLT SC
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0 OHV
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
N/A
Total Drop
N/A
Tire Size
235 75 15
My credo
Sometimes you eat the bear, sometimes the bear eats you.
10mpg from a fusion?

Thats what my 460 F250 gets.

I wouldnt bet it was the alternator that made the difference. Maybe his old one was so weak it was throwing the ECM off?

Either way a good regular output would of fixed that too.
Interesting
 

00t444e

Active Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2018
Messages
317
Reaction score
217
Points
43
Location
Southern OH
Vehicle Year
2003
Make / Model
Ranger ext cab
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Oddly today, a good friend of mine is getting better gas mileage on his 2012 Ford Fusion 3.5 Liter engine since he replaced only the Alternator with a high output Alternator. His alternator was originally week for a month or so and he was getting real bad fuel economy, till he changed it today because his battery died.... Is this possible, and this is all he changed?

He found this out from his onboard fuel computer in the car, as he went from 10 mpg originally on the older alternator, to 19 mpg now with the new higher output alternator. I shit you not. This is very weird indeed.

If so I'm thinking of getting a higher output Alternator on my 93 Ranger 4.0l. It's due for one soon.
Onboard fuel MPG readout means nothing, they aren't accurate, hand clacluleted MPG is the only way to go. If the alternator was going bad low voltage can cause all kinds of electrical issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gaz

RobbieD

2.9l Mafia
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
3,915
Reaction score
3,514
Points
113
Location
Georgia
Vehicle Year
1984,1990,1994
Make / Model
Ford
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
My credo
Toonces drives a Ranger . . . . just not very well.
Since I put a lightning rod on my Ranger I've been getting 832 miles per gallon with a 2.8 auto.

lighning.jpg


It does make the radio reception suck, though.
 

gaz

Well-Known Member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Messages
1,441
Reaction score
670
Points
113
Location
Wa, Bremerton 98310
Vehicle Year
1987
Make / Model
Ford
Engine Size
87Ranger Endrigo 2.9l, 87BII Endrigo 4.0l
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Ranger 5" (2" suspension), BII 4" suspension
Total Drop
Ranger 5sp, BII A4LD
Tire Size
Ranger 33"/4:10LS, BII 29"/3:73LS
My credo
Deengineer until it is how Blue Oval should have sold it!!
@Angry Possum ,
Yes, yes a larger alternator can definitely improve fuel economy but only when aimed correctly and the moon is out. You buddy clearly had the moon window open 👀 and failed to notice.
 

Lefty

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2022
Messages
1,695
Reaction score
1,853
Points
113
Location
Saint Paul, MN
Vehicle Year
2003
Make / Model
Ranger Edge
Transmission
Automatic
Oddly today, a good friend of mine is getting better gas mileage on his 2012 Ford Fusion 3.5 Liter engine since he replaced only the Alternator with a high output Alternator. His alternator was originally week for a month or so and he was getting real bad fuel economy, till he changed it today because his battery died.... Is this possible, and this is all he changed?

He found this out from his onboard fuel computer in the car, as he went from 10 mpg originally on the older alternator, to 19 mpg now with the new higher output alternator. I shit you not. This is very weird indeed.

If so I'm thinking of getting a higher output Alternator on my 93 Ranger 4.0l. It's due for one soon.
I wouldn't know about all this, but if should get a new alternator, get an uprated voltage regulator too. They are not expensive and can be be installed in no time.
 

Angry Possum

No Fat Chicks, Truck Will Scrape
Supporting Member
Law Enforcement
Joined
Sep 18, 2021
Messages
594
Reaction score
473
Points
63
Location
Staten Island NY
Vehicle Year
1993
Make / Model
Ranger XLT SC
Engine Type
4.0 V6
Engine Size
4.0 OHV
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
N/A
Total Drop
N/A
Tire Size
235 75 15
My credo
Sometimes you eat the bear, sometimes the bear eats you.
Onboard fuel MPG readout means nothing, they aren't accurate, hand clacluleted MPG is the only way to go. If the alternator was going bad low voltage can cause all kinds of electrical issues.
His car actually ran a lot better also. It's not just the gas mileage.
 

bobbywalter

TRS Technical Staff
TRS Event Staff
V8 Engine Swap
TRS Technical Advisor
TRS Banner 2012-2015
TRS 20th Anniversary
Ugly Truck of Month
TRS Event Participant
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
23,470
Reaction score
4,668
Points
113
Location
woodhaven mi
Vehicle Year
1988
Make / Model
FORD mostly
Engine Type
V8
Engine Size
BIGGER
Transmission
Automatic
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
sawzall?
Tire Size
33-44
My credo
it is easier to fix and understand than "her"
He inadvertently corrected the bad connections in the swap.

There must have been a ground issue on a sub system since it was starting okish.

Bigger alternator would use more energy if you were using it.
 

sgtsandman

Aircraft Fuel Tank Diver
TRS Forum Moderator
U.S. Military - Active
TRS 20th Anniversary
TRS Event Participant
Ham Radio Operator
GMRS Radio License
Joined
Mar 11, 2017
Messages
12,887
Reaction score
12,687
Points
113
Location
Aliquippa, PA
Vehicle Year
2011/2019
Make / Model
Ranger XLT/FX4
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC/2.3 Ecoboost
2WD / 4WD
4WD
Total Lift
Pre-2008 lift/Stock
Tire Size
31X10.5R15/265/65R17
Replacing the alternator fixed other issues due to the low voltage output and possibly bad/dirty connections.

It is possible the vehicle in question has the system that partially disengages the alternator to save on fuel when the battery is fully charged. So, the alternator could have been running full tilt all the time and thus contributing to the low fuel mileage.

But that isn’t the entire answer. The above comments about low votlage to the and perhaps dirty connections are more likely to be the main culprits.

Also, as stated, the onboard mpg calculators are not accurate. They can be close but that is the best you are going to get. The one in my 2019 is consistently 1 mpg less than taking the trip milage divided by the gallons used to fill the tank. The same goes for the mpg average on my ScanGauge II in the 2011. At best, they are just a reference point to get an idea how the vehicle is doing mileage wise but I wouldn’t trust it as a reliable data point.
 

Bgunner

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2018
Messages
1,787
Reaction score
1,086
Points
113
Location
Western Mass.
Vehicle Year
1994
Make / Model
Ford/Ranger XLT
Engine Type
3.0 V6
Transmission
Manual
2WD / 4WD
2WD
Tire Size
225/70/R15
My credo
If it's not broken Don't Fix It!
If the bushings/bearings in an alt are going bad this increases the amount of force needed to turn the armature in the alt causing a drop in fuel efficiency. Usually when an alternators bushing or bearings are going bad there is a noticeable sound coming from it to let you know there is an issue.

Is this the case here? Most likely not due to no mention of noise but I am adding this as a reason why a bad high mileage alternator can decrease fuel mileage.
 

Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Today's birthdays

Member & Vendor Upgrades

For a small yearly donation, you can support this forum and receive a 'Supporting Member' banner, or become a 'Supporting Vendor' and promote your products here. Click the banner to find out how.

Truck of The Month


Mudtruggy
May Truck of The Month

Recently Featured

Want to see your truck here? Share your photos and details in the forum.

Follow TRS On Instagram

TRS Events

25th Anniversary Sponsors

Check Out The TRS Store


Sponsored Ad


Sponsored Ad

Sponsored Ad


Amazon Deals

Top